tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7367858478557001111.post3371248233791530668..comments2015-09-10T08:28:43.230+01:00Comments on Gary Doncasters' CG Portfolio: Major Project - Next Previz's Based On Alan's And Phil's AdviceGary Doncasterhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16066252545605574084noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7367858478557001111.post-48874306278306883522011-04-02T20:42:32.552+01:002011-04-02T20:42:32.552+01:00Okay! :D Well, that makes more sense now. In reg...Okay! :D Well, that makes more sense now. In regard to the 'conflicting' advice - I think the point is about making best use of your models; for me, it's about taking me closer once you've established the models as 'diagrams' - basically, put me into the space more - hence my suggestion that you use a more filmic approach to the number of shots; at the end, your sequence is filmic anyway, as the train comes towards us, and then the camera turns to follow it. Don't be confused, Gary - just be decisive. Remember, you're trying to evoke a sense of wonder and nostalgia for this special vehicle, so find a way to involve the audience - and that might be through a more filmic relationship between long shots, mid shots, close-ups and a more human scale POV.tutorphilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11842833126210822641noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7367858478557001111.post-33157165271359591612011-03-31T11:39:35.984+01:002011-03-31T11:39:35.984+01:00Hi sorry for the confusion but yeah for the previz...Hi sorry for the confusion but yeah for the previz I have just used the same coach but for the actual final piece you will see three different carriages <br />1st - a dining carriage<br />2nd - a business carriage<br />3rd - a bar carriageGary Doncasterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16066252545605574084noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7367858478557001111.post-50763231615248546722011-03-29T18:20:04.654+01:002011-03-29T18:20:04.654+01:00hey gary - now I'm confused. Why is it necess...hey gary - now I'm confused. Why is it necessary to show the 'same' carriage materialised 3 times? Or are you using the model of one carriage as a substitute for 2 different ones you're yet to model? If it's the same carriage materialising 3 times, then this just seems like a terrific waste of your audience's time - once we've seen one materialise can't we just assume that we know what the others will look like too - and so therefore cut to the coupling sequence? Please clarify. Cheers.tutorphilhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11842833126210822641noreply@blogger.com